Bitter Pill: Part One

TIME magazine recently released an article called “Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us“.  The article raises several points about the US healthcare industry and why health care costs so much in this country.  As a budding health policy wonk, this article is extremely interesting to me – however it’s sheer length and the number of issues raised in article lead me to believe that one blog post is insufficient coverage.  So I’m going to drill down section by section into some important points.  This isn’t necessarily a positive or negative critique of the article.  Rather, I’d like to offer some opinions and some evidence both in support of and to refute the author’s words.

Section 1: Routine Care, Unforgettable Bills

I want to start where author Steven Brill starts – with the case of Sean Recchi.  The 42 year old native of Lancaster, Ohio has an unfortunate turn of events when he’s diagnosed with leukemia.  His wife does what any loved one or family member would do – she directs her husband to what she believes to be the best possible care for Sean’s condition, and she takes him to MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.  Self-employed and unable to afford comprehensive health insurance, the financial woes associated with Sean’s disease therefore begin.

To say that Sean’s condition is an unfortunate event doesn’t even begin to describe the impact of a cancer diagnosis on an individual, let alone someone so young.  And although I somewhat question the choice, I’m not trying to belittle Stephanie Recchi’s decision to travel to MD Anderson for care (ranked the #1 cancer hospital by US News and World Report) – after all, she did what she thought was best – although one could argue that similar care could be received closer to home at the Cleveland Clinic (ranked #6).  My own parents made much the similar decision when they consulted oncologists both at the University of Pittsburgh’s Hillman Cancer Center as well as the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins (ranked #3), but the Recchi’s choice brings about the bigger issue of what I like to call “name brand” medicine.

Americans have the idea that “name brand” medical care – care received at the nation’s well known, well recognized, and top-ranked hospitals – is always better than care received at lesser known community hospitals.  This idea that US News and World Report has ingrained into our collective minds is only partially true.  Certainly for certain types of specialized care, the well known academic medical centers of our nation’s “medical meccas” are probably the best choice.  I could go on a long diatribe about how these rankings (especially from US News and World Report) come about – but reputation and the number of specialists in a particular area often play heavily into those rankings.  For routine care, however, the hospitals with the best reputations do not necessarily provide care with the best performance.  If you don’t believe me, go to whynotthebest.org, and you can compare your local community hospital to the “top-notch” hospital in your area on a variety of quality measures.  Additionally, many of the specialists at top-notch hospitals are being farmed out to increasingly more sophisticated community hospitals, where the cost of care is cheaper.

Advertisements

About justgngr

the ramblings of a medical professional by day, judgmental ginger by night
This entry was posted in health policy, medicine, politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Bitter Pill: Part One

  1. BosGuy Blog says:

    Such a sad situation w/o even needing to go into the details. You are correct though that one need not go across the country to receive excellent care. Knowledgeable and very capable doctors reside in hospitals through out the US.

  2. sqhc says:

    Reblogged this on Students for Quality Health Care and commented:
    the first in a series of commentaries from our group’s president

  3. I just want to explain why I was so desperate to get Sean down to M D Anderson. My dad had the same cancer and was treated here in Ohio. It came back six months later and he was told it was too late. A friend of his directed him to M D. They gave him a stem cell transplant. He died 8 years later from lung problems from the hometown radiation the first round. Sean received Hyper-CVAD ( 6 straight days of chemo) at M D. We had to go home to continue treatments because of obvious money issues. No one here would continue the treatments, frankly because they couldn’t, and we were forced to change up the plan to Rchop!
    -Stephanie Recchi

    • justgngr says:

      Stephanie – no explanation needed. You certainly don’t need to justify your decision to me (or anyone else for that matter). No disrespect meant at all – you did what you thought you needed to do for your husband under unfortunate circumstances.

  4. It’s all good. I just wanted to explain more about the situation:)

  5. Pingback: Bitter Pill — redesign of health care | quality health care please!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s